Jip Van Assendelft vs Pieter De Lange Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to recent second serve performance, Assendelft shows a significant advantage, winning 71.43% of points compared to Lange's 39.35%. Is the second serve critical for match outcomes? Historically, yes, it holds high predictive accuracy.
• In return games, Lange excels on second serves, winning 55.89% of points against opponents, surpassing Assendelft's 40%. Alternatively, Assendelft leads slightly in first serve returns with 34.38% over Lange's 29.48%.
• Under pressure, Assendelft is better at saving breakpoints, managing 66.67% whereas Lange saves 51.52%. Does this indicate better mental resilience for Assendelft?
• Performance insight over the last year shows Assendelft winning more matches overall at 66.67% compared to Lange's 61.9%.
• Lange's best surface is hard courts, winning 69%, while Assendelft favors clay, with a win rate of 53%. How might the playing surface impact their performance?
• Both players are accustomed to Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Assendelft slightly more successful (66.67% win rate) than Lange (61.9%).
• In terms of opponent quality, Lange has faced stronger competition with average ranked opponents at 278.57, compared to Assendelft's 289.67.
• During deciding sets, Lange has a higher success rate, winning 71% of such situations, as opposed to Assendelft's 50%.
• For breakpoint conversions, Assendelft shows remarkable efficiency, converting all opportunities (100%), while Lange has converted 44.44%.

Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match highlights a stark contrast in serving performance, where Assendelft's superior second serve success rate could create a foundational advantage.

Lange appears stronger in return games, particularly against opponent second serves. This ability to disrupt could be a pivotal factor.

Each player's resilience under pressure reveals another layer of competition. Assendelft's ability to save breakpoints suggests greater mental fortitude.

The surface preference might influence the result, provided it aligns with either Lange's or Assendelft's strengths, underscoring the importance of match conditions.

Taking into account all factors, Assendelft manifests as the likely favorite to win due to superior serving performance and effective breakpoint handling.